Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Not Everything is Black and White

I am still just in stunned shock of the effects in this film!  For 1946, wow were they ahead of their time!  Nowadays, we would punch out some buttons on the Hollywood Adobe software and let the computer do the special fx work.  But back in the day, it was all done literally by hand.  The actors had to move a certain way, the lighting had to be set up just perfect, there really was no room for mistakes.  Time was still money back then and I'm sure the lush sets, costumes and the like were costly.  Some people I have talked to don't like black and white films because it lacks the color and maybe they connect color with emotion and life- color does add something vital and special to a film. But I also think that fairy tales, Gothic mysteries and horror films are the best when filmed in black and white.  I have always thought the 1940's film, "Jane Eyre" starring Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine, was just wonderfully atmospheric in capturing the brooding Edward Rochester, the innocent and intrigued young governess Jane, and lastly, the cold stone foreboding manor of Thornfield Hall.  The black and white contrasts were perfect to show maybe not full out emotion, but maybe the mystery of the lack thereof.  It's hard to describe, especially in a blog, but with films like these it is more atmospheric, mysterious, and even though you know that this era of film doesn't have the same heart stopping- scary moments that will make you jump in your seats, it's almost like the dull colors come to life with how the lighting is played out- these cold white hands reach out and grab you, forcing you to sit on the edge of your seat and not turn away for a second.  It commands attention completely.  In the old horror movies such as "Dracula" starring Bela Lugosi from the 1930's, in my opinion, it is much more terrorizing when at the beginning the camera zooms in slowly as a coffin lid starts to open, and a deathly pale hand creeps out and then the audience is forced to look into the eyes of Count Dracula.  He is the undead, and the black and white showcases this very well.  Maybe that's why "La Belle et la Bete" had so much atmosphere in black and white.  In any event, the incredible special effects totally grabbed my attention and I forgot who or where I was for an hour and a half.  That to me, is a good flick!

Since this film is in the French language, it wasn't like watching an English film that I can just look at the actors and know what's going on.  There were English subtitles at the bottom and I had to constantly pay attention to make sure I wouldn't miss anything.  But I think it was good to read the subtitles rather than the film being voiced over- to me, it's more annoying and distracting seeing their mouths move but not in time with the sound...lol  The film was not all talk, talk, talk so that was a plus to be able to focus on the set & costume design, and most of all- the acting.  The acting was there- it was on.  There was the over emphasized dramatic movements, such as one would see in any old films from that era.  But there were small subtle movements from certain cast members that was not indicative of American actors.  I remember a certain point in the film that the Beast is caught by Belle, standing right outside her door.  It's as if he's snooping and wants to go in to spy on her.  She immediately becomes angry with him and yells at him to leave.  To me, that was so not the "damsel in distress" card.  I gained new appreciation for her character after that.  She is almost ahead of her time: headstrong, honest and loyal, but had this deep certainty of who she believed this Beast was after some time, and almost trying to show him who he was, but from her eyes. The Beast was as I would expect.  Dark, animalistic, brooding, at war within himself.  He is both man and beast and is always fighting both sides of himself.  Unlike the Disney version, there wasn't really any back story to the Prince before he became a beast.  But perhaps that added to his mysterious aura, not knowing he if would turn beastly and violent, or take Belle's hand gently in his gloved one and walk with her in his enchanted garden along the castle grounds.  I noticed one other similarity that I assume Disney gleaned inspiration from the 1946 version- the one human aspect of "La Bete" was his eyes.  They were big and clear, piercing and fierce....but completely human.  I see some of this reflect in certain "Phantom of the Opera" versions.  The Phantom must act and show emotion with either a half or full mask on his face.  The Beast must act with all the fx makeup and the lavish costume.  Cocteau made certain to always capture the eyes of the Beast when he was speaking with Belle or watching her from afar.  This is the one window which the viewer can see into his real human soul.  It gives the viewer hope that there really is a man deep down inside, and that with the arrival of Belle, he is starting to discover that man after he has been buried for so many years.

Let's get down to the special effects.  Wow!  Such a small word for how spectacular and innovative this film was with their effects.  I don't want to give away all the secrets of what made this film so wonderful, so I will touch on some of the fx that I really liked.

*When Belle first arrives at the Beast's castle, she walks in the door, but once she gets inside everything turns into slow motion.  She shuts the door and turns, then starts to run down the main hall with her long cloak billowing about her.  At the same time, there is absolutely NO sound.  I think that perhaps the director wanted you to feel what Belle felt.  Here she is, leaving her ill father and going to the lair of a beast- a creature who she was afraid would attack and devour her whole!  As she runs it seems as though time stands still and I guess when time stands still, so does sound.  It was very effective.

*During the beginning when Belle's father arrives at the Beast's mysterious castle in the woods, he enters the dining room and seats himself at a table where there is food and wine laid out.  When he reaches out for the pitcher of wine, a hand comes up out of the table, grabs the pitcher, and proceeds to pour it into the goblet.

*The same scene with the mysterious hand that pours drink into Belle's father's goblet, he is seated at the table after having dinner- he grows sleepy and falls asleep in the chair at the table.  The crackling fire blazes, lulling him into an even deeper sleep.  At one point, the audience gets to see the gorgeous and ornate fireplace, that has statues on either side.  But one of the statues suddenly opens its eyes and looks over to the sleeping man at the table.  Then smoke starts to come out of the statue's nose- very creative way of turning the statue-man into the chimney's flue!  These actors which have to play a statue or part of the house are so talented because there has to be such stillness, especially when all they can move are their eyes or even a slight move of their head.

*One of my other favorite parts is when Belle arrives at the castle and is shown running down the main hall in slow motion- but it's what happens after that I love even more.  She enters another door and the camera speed goes back to normal.  There is a long, long hall that is full of open windows and white curtains billowing out from the howling wind outside.  As Belle starts to walk, she isn't really walking- she is floating down the long wide corridor.  It's like she was on one of those moving walkways at the airport...lol  Totally effective though, it was as almost as if she was a ghost floating down a hall.

*There is an interesting aspect about the Beast.  At certain points of the film, he has wisps of smoke that come off of him, around his neck area and hands.  Not sure what the director was going for regarding that, the only thing I can assume is that the Beast is enchanted, ever since he was turned into a creature- its just a small effect that will make the Beast come off even more mysterious.

*At the very end when the Beast turns into the Prince, it appears to me that they filmed it backwards.  I have seen this same sort of effect done in the Francis Ford Coppola film, "Bram Stoker's Dracula"- if they film it backwards, it comes off eerie or "off."  The Beast is on the ground, Belle thinks he is dead and all of a sudden, he is the transformed prince and rises up swiftly and very agile, until he is standing up.  Very cool effect!

*In the beginning when Belle's father first walks into the castle, there are what looks to be statues of arms each holding a candelabra.  But as he walks forward, each arm extends out and the candle is magically lit.  It's almost as if the arms are guiding/lighting the way, showing him where to go.  As soon as I saw this effect, I immediately thought of Joel Schumacher's 2004 film of the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical, "The Phantom of the Opera."  Mr. Schumacher or someone on that set had to have seen the 1946 B&B!  When the Phantom coaxes Christine through the magical mirror and they start down a long corridor, there are the same arms holding candelabras- and each time they take a step forward, the arms move out to the side and each candle magically is lit.  When I saw this film in the theater back in 2004, I thought that effect was so cool- but at least now I know where they gleaned inspiration from. :-)

*A little over halfway through the film, the Beast finds Belle very sad.  She tells him her father is dying and she desperately wants to go see him.  The Beast tells her that she must promise to return in 1 weeks time, otherwise he himself will die from a broken heart.  Belle agrees.  The Beast then gives her one of his gloves and he tells her that when she puts this on, it will transport her to wherever she desires to go.  So after the Beast leaves, she lays down on her bed, puts the glove on, and wishes to go back to her father's house.  She instantly disappears from the bed and the next scene she is almost "coming out of the wall" at her father's house!  That's the best way I can describe that effect, that one gets me because those are effects you see in modern cinema and they "CG" everything.  Back in the day, they would have done all effects by hand.  Pretty impressive.

*As I was telling my husband about this film, which now he says he HAS to see- I recalled another effect I really liked.  When Belle sees the Beast for the first time, she faints.  He picks her up and carries her to her room.  As they walk through the doorway, you see first her feet that go from her more plain shoes/attire to very fancy...and as he keeps going through the doorway, her dress and hair change as well!  Still scratching my head, trying to figure out how they flipping did that back in the day!

I'm sure that I'm forgetting some things, but I have given away too much of the movie already!
Rent it, buy it, or if you have Hulu Plus, WATCH THIS FILM.  If you can look past the fact it is in French and will have to read the subtitles, this film will amaze and mystify you.  Plus, it is a beloved fairy tale- "Beauty and the Beast" is timeless, and any version I have ever seen always has something interpreted a bit different.  This story, like so many other fables or fairy tales, they never get old........

Saturday, March 28, 2015

"Every Shot is a Painting...the lights and all!"

The title of this post is a direct quote from an online Phantom of the Opera phan/friend of mine, Melly.  She is from France and wrote this quote on my Facebook after I had posted I had watched the 1946 Beauty and the Beast.  She is right.  It's a perfect way to describe this film.  Some of the photos I have seen online are not all publicity stills- some are actual stills from various scenes.  They are clear, well lit, and superbly done.  It never ceases to amaze me how one perfect photo with not even a fancy background or backdrop, can be beautiful.

The gorgeous and graceful Josette Day~


Just thought this was a cool picture of the Beast becoming...well...the beast!








 Yes, the photo below is an actual actor who plays a statue by the fireplace!









On a side note, I found this photo back in 2007 on some online site and never was able to get the model's name BUT I do remember they were going for a "Beauty and the Beast" theme.  Once I watched the 1946 version, I see where they got some inspiration from.  Here's the photo- very cool~


Friday, March 27, 2015

"La Belle et la Bete" 2014 Film~

"The legend is reborn..."

I am so excited to say that another French version of Beauty and the Beast came out in 2014! Not sure if I can rent it, but totally have to look into that!  I know one of my next purchases will be the 1946 version on blu ray!!  On top of everything, the costumes are to die for! :-)



I "liked" this film on Facebook a couple weeks ago.  The trailer looks just incredible!  Here is the trailer with English subtitles:

It looks as though they are staying very close to the storyline of the 1946 version which is good.

Here is French actress Lea Seydoux as "Belle"~


Vincent Cassel as the "La Bete" aka Beast/Prince~



As expected, the visual art and cinematography is stunning~




In Awe of this French Film!

I am still in awe of this film the day after I watched it.  First of all, I like foreign films but don't make a habit of watching them.  Guess I will admit oftentimes I am too lazy to read the English subtitles...lol  But for years I have been wanting to watch the 1946 French film, "La Belle et la Bete" which featured lovely French actress Josette Day and Jean Marais as the Beast/Prince.
First of all, I was stunned, in awe, and bewildered by the special FX this black & white 1946 film had!  I never in a million years thought that films of that era could even do HALF of the effects this film had.  I underestimated European film and I NEVER thought I would do that...haha

"La Belle et la Bete" was a film directed by French poet and filmmaker, Jean Cocteau.  It was released in 1946 and was based off the fairy tale written in the 1700's by French author and governess, Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont.  When the film released in New York City in 1947, it was met with rave reviews.  One critic, Bosley Crowther stated, "...a priceless fabric of subtle images...a fabric of gorgeous visual metaphors, of undulating movements and rhythmic pace, of hypnotic sounds and music, of casually congealing ideas."

I don't want to give the entire story away, although many know the general story of, "Beauty and the Beast", however there are a few scenes that I had never seen in any other version of this story before. Obviously you have the beautiful and loving, Belle, whom her father loves very much.  Their family is hurting financially and he gets an opportunity to make a small fortune.  He has to set out on his horse for a long, grueling trip.  Before he leaves, he asks his daughters what they want him to bring back.  The sisters are greedy and want jewels and other finery.  However, Belle just asks him for a simple rose because roses do not grow where they live.  Their father sets out on his quest and ends up falling into financial failure, having to return home penniless.  He becomes lost in the dense woods on his way home and finds this mystical castle literally in the middle of the woods.  He takes solace there and eats food and drink that are laid out on the table, as if someone or something was waiting for him.  He falls asleep by the crackling fire and wakes up the next day to a defoning roar.  He leaves the castle immediately and on his way to his horse, he spots a rose bush.  He picks one rose for his beloved daughter Belle, but as soon as he does, the Beast shows himself and tells him that of all things, his roses are not to be touched- and that punishment will be the man's death.  The man begs for his life and states that the only reason he picked the flower was for his daughter.  The beast seems intrigued and tells the man that he can either choose death now, or send one of his daughters to take his place.  The man bows before the Beast and says he will come back, and will not go back in his word to produce one of his daughters.

You probably know where it goes from here.  Belle feels guilty that her father will have to sacrifice his own life just because she wanted him to bring her back a rose.  So she goes to the Beast's castle and offers to stay with him if he lets her father live.  They spend more and more time together, and, well Belle becomes fond of the Beast.  Obviously it's a fairy tale with a happy ending.  Belle breaks the magical curse that has been plaguing the Beast for years, but he's not really a beast- he is a handsome prince who has been cursed to live the life of a beast-man. The only way he can become human again is to have true love from a maiden who can see past his ugliness.  And of course, the lovely Belle is just that girl!

I love princess fairy tales- always have.  I also like the little "moral of the story" and this tale is most definitely that one should look beyond a mere physical appearance and seek to find the person's soul. Beauty isn't everything and vanity does pose a price.  In the Disney version, the Prince is arrogant and vain.  When a witch disguises herself as an old ugly hag, the Prince turns her out in the cold.  Only then does the witch turn back into her beautiful self and teach the Prince a fatal lesson: do not always judge a book by its cover.  He learns his lesson and is then able to find his one true love and live happily ever after......

"Love can also make an ugly man beautiful"- "La Belle et la Bete" 

Watch this trailer~

And here is an original trailer~



Josette Day as the lovely, yet determined heroine, Belle~


Jean Marais as first "The Beast"- who is misunderstood and is at war within himself- half human and half beast in his mind~


And then Marais as Belle's suitor back home, "Avenant"~


And finally, Marais as the handsome, dashing Prince~



~Believe me, this film will leave you entranced and believing yet again in the happily ever after.~

**Please see my other blog for my review/thoughts on this spectacular film!